Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Chiles v. Salazar, et al
as 23-1002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KALEY CHILES
Defendant / Appellant:
PATTY SALAZAR, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Department of Regulatory Agencies, REINA SBARBARO-GORDON, in her official capacity as Program Director of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and the State Board of Addiction Counselor Examiners, JENNIFER LUTTMAN, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and others
Chiles v. Salazar, et al
as 22-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KALEY CHILES
Defendant / Appellee:
PATTY SALAZAR, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Department of Regulatory Agencies, REINA SBARBARO-GORDON, in her official capacity as Program Director of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and the State Board of Addiction Counselor Examiners, JENNIFER LUTTMAN, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Licensed Professional Counselor Examiners and others
Chiles v. Salazar et al
as 1:2022cv02287
Plaintiff:
Kaley Chiles
Defendant:
Patty Salazar, Reina Sbarbaro-Gordon, Jennifer Luttman and others
Intervenor Defendant:
One Colorado, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amy Skinner v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv03795
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Amy Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Skinner v. Electromedical Associates, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00233
Defendant:
Electromedical Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Skinner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cordero et al v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03411
Plaintiff:
Tempora Cordero , Anna Ladiner , Travis Cunningham and others
Defendant:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
