Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson, et al v. Donovan, et al
as 23-1765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATALIE ANDERSON and ANDRE C. BISASOR
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK E. DONOVAN, NH SUPREME COURT, NH RULES ADVISORY COMMITTEE and others
Interested Party:
CRAIG S. DONAIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv30090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PARDUE v. SANFORD et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
KYRA L PARDUE
Defendant:
CITY OF SANFORD, STEVEN BUCK, BECKY BRINK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
