Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,974
Zaragoza, et al. v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-1804
Plaintiff: VIRGINIA "VICKY" ZARAGOZA, an individual, F.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Gilbert Zaragoza, an individual and L.S.C., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Nancy Gonzalez an individual
Defendant: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity, Deputy DAVID ANDERSON, #5097 and DOES, 2-10, Inclusive
In re: Rick Anderson
as 24-145
Petitioner: In re: RICK JAMES ANDERSON, a/k/a Lil Rick
Entergy Arkansas, LLC v. Doyle Webb, et al
as 24-1586
Plaintiff: Entergy Arkansas, LLC
Defendant: Doyle Webb, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas Public Service Commission, Katie Anderson, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Arkansas Public Service Commission and Justin Tate, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Arkansas Public Service Commission
E.J.T. v. County of Jefferson, et al.
as 24-1717
Plaintiff: E.J.T., a minor, by and through his Conservator, InTRUSTment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant: COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, a public body, TYLER W. ANDERSON, in his individual capacity and ARJANG ARYANFARD, in his individual capacity
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff: RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant: DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
United States v. Marcus Anderson
as 24-1562
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Marcus Jerell Anderson
Knott et al v. Frerichs et al
as 3:2024cv03067
Plaintiff: David Knott and United Asset Recovery Inc
Defendant: Michael W Frerichs, Mario Treto, Jr., Edward R Bonifas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph v. H. Stark
as 24-679
Plaintiff: ANDERSON JOSEPH
Defendant: H. STARK
Joseph v. Row Hotel
as 24-689
Plaintiff: ANDERSON JOSEPH
Defendant: ROW HOTEL
Joseph v. Spring Family Residence
as 24-663
Plaintiff: ANDERSON JOSEPH
Defendant: SPRING FAMILY RESIDENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?