Cases 21 - 30 of 600
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. GARNETT
as 1:2023cv02002
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANDERSON
Defendant:
PAUL GARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BMO BANK N.A. v. HYW TRANSPORTATION LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01900
Plaintiff:
BMO BANK N.A.
Defendant:
HYW TRANSPORTATION LLC and JOHNNY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ANDERSON v. CHALOS et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
ORVILLE A. ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant:
CHALOS and POLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
KRISTI M. ANDERSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HANAFI v. UETSA TSAKITS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Mary Hanafi
Defendant:
Uetsa Tsakits, Inc. doing business as MaxLend, David Johnson, Kirk Michael Chewning and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Anderson v. Meridian Radiology et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Nathan Anderson and Nathan A. Anderson
Defendant:
Meridian Radiology and Carl E Kuenzli
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
