Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Molina-Molina v. Jamison
as 1:2023cv07523
Petitioner:
Jorge Andres Molina-Molina
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timlick #075126 v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Richard B Timlick
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Wayne Jordan, Robert Defresne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-13710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW L. FAISON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO, CHARLES MAIORARIA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Matthew Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-12585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAESTRO MATTHEW FAISON, a.k.a. Matthew James Faison, a.k.a. Leo Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO, CHARLES MAIORARIA, ANDRES MOLINA and others
Pronin v. Schwartz et al
as 1:2021cv22602
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Yuryevich Pronin
Defendant:
Schwartz, Lieutenant Anderson, H. Derys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina-Zavala v. Garland
as 21-274
Petitioner:
ANDRES MOLINA-ZAVALA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Matthew Levi Faison, Jr. v. Global Experts Outsourcing, et al
as 21-11890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAESTRO MATTHEW FAISON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDRES MOLINA, MARSHA NICHOLS, GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING, GEO and others
Andres Molina-Zavala v. William Barr
as 20-73191
Petitioner:
ANDRES MOLINA-ZAVALA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
FAISON v. GLOBAL EXPERTS OUTSOURCING et al
as 3:2020cv05828
Defendant:
ANDRES MOLINA, MARSHA NICHOLS, CHARLES MAIORARIA and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEVI FAISON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00581
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
