Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Rio Consumnes Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Romaine Morgan
Defendant:
Sacramento County Rio Consumnes Correctional Center, Rio Consumnes Correctional Cental Medical and Andrew Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vrh v. Bergman et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Defendant:
Natalyn Bergman, Andrew Ho, Denise M. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vrh v. Bergman et al
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Defendant:
Natalyn Bergman, Andrew Ho, Denise M. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hesse v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2021at00986
Plaintiff:
Michael Frederick Hesse
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Phoebe Foo, Lynn Billett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv01931
Plaintiff:
Michael Hesse
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Phoebe Foo, Lynn Billett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Miller
as 19-2525
Defendant / Appellee:
P.O. Andrew Ho, 79th Precinct, P.O. Jamaal Miller, Shield#18339, 79th Precinct, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Rogers
Defendant:
New York Police Department and 79th Precinct, (NYPD)
Rogers v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv03610
Defendant:
79th Precinct (NYPD), City of New York, P.O. Andrew Ho and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golds v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03943
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Mikhail Goncharov, Police Officer Andrew Ho and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Golds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Stanislaus et al
as 1:2014cv01656
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Cook
Defendant:
Stanislaus County and Andrew Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salas v. Ho
as 1:2014cv01110
Plaintiff:
Rene Salas
Defendant:
Andrew Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
