Cases 1 - 10 of 36
(HC) Smith v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
Brian Andrew Smith
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cupp v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cupp and Ronald Vernon Cupp
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Tennis Wick, Tyra Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
bey v. Campa et al
as 3:2022cv09154
Plaintiff:
hiramu-el-kenyatta bey and Hiramu El Kenyatta Bey
Defendant:
Michelle Campa, Greg, Sky Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Cupp v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2022cv04307
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cupp
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Andrew Smith, Todd Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff:
Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
D'Arrigo Bros. Co., of California v. Andrew Smith Company, LLC
as 5:2020cv07562
Plaintiff:
D'Arrigo Bros. Co., of California
Defendant:
Andrew Smith Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Clark v. Union City et al
as 3:2020cv03501
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Clark
Defendant:
Juan Moreno, Matthew Blanchard, Andrew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
