Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Burke and Rutecki, LLC v. The City of Lewes et al
as 1:2021cv01727
Plaintiff:
Burke and Rutecki, LLC
Defendant:
The City of Lewes, The Mayor and City Council of the City of Lewes, The City of Lewes Planning Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pankotai v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00034
Respondent:
Warden of Northeastern New Mexico Correctional Facility and United States of America
Petitioner:
Andrew William Pankotai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2018cv11606
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DERRICK WILLIAMS and ANDREW WILLIAMS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pankotai v. Kovach et al
as 4:2017cv00991
Petitioner:
Andrew William Pankotai
Respondent:
Bruce Kovach and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramon Williams v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1705
Petitioner:
RAMON ANDREW WILLIAMS, aka Andrew Denton Williamson, aka Ramon Williams
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramon Williams v. Attorney General United State
as 16-3816
Petitioner:
RAMON ANDREW WILLIAMS, aka Andrew Denton Williamson, aka Ramon Williams
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pankotai v. Northumberland County Courthouse et al
as 4:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Pankotai
Defendant:
Northumberland County Courthouse, William Harvey Wiest, William Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James William
as 15-1324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ANDREW WILLIAMS
USA v. James William
as 14-3362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES ANDREW WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
