Cases 1 - 10 of 75
DAS v. IROBOT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv02138
Plaintiff:
DYLAN DAS
Defendant:
IROBOT CORPORATION, COLIN M. ANGLE and JULIE ZEILER
Biggers v. The State of Texas
as 23-7784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENESHA BIGGERS
Plaintiff:
M.F., A minor and Z.S., A minor
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, NEW YORK ACS, EL PASO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jiangsu Beier Decoration Materials Co Ltd v. Angle World LLC
as 23-2450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIANGSU BEIER DECORATION MATERIALS CO LTD
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGLE WORLD LLC
Agro Holdings LLC et al v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Agro Holdings LLC, Alameda Aggregates LLC, Aquatic Creek LLC and others
Defendant:
Arden Row Assets LLC, United States of America, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dixon v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01307
Plaintiff:
Brian Dixon
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Montgomery v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv08495
Plaintiff:
Sean Montgomery
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Moore v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv08445
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Reid v. iRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv07498
Plaintiff:
Joseph Reid
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle, Mohamad Ali and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
