Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Angulo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jose Angulo
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angulo et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jose Angulo and Claudia De La Pena
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angulo v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024oe00153
Plaintiff:
Jose Angulo
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angulo v. Serendipity Day Spa, LLC
as 1:2023cv11820
Plaintiff:
Rachel Angulo
Defendant:
Serendipity Day Spa, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cordes et al v. United Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 5:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Vaccaro & Associates Claims Adjusters, Inc., OneSource Claims Management, LLC, United Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Guzman, Angulo Transportation Services, LLC and Marcellina Cordes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Carlos Angulo
as 20-6062
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS ANGULO, aka Carlos Javier Armenta, aka Carlos Armenta-Angulo, aka Carlos Parra Aguilar
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Angulo v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05652
Plaintiff:
Adan Angulo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angulo v. Bowen et al
as 4:2018cv01844
Defendant:
Correctional Officer John Doe, Warden Richard Bowen and Director Gary C. Mohr
Plaintiff:
Nestor Angulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Angulo-Tapia
as 2:2018mj30211
Defendant:
Leopoldo Angulo-Tapia
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
