Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Cascadia Wildlands, et al v. USDA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35508
Plaintiff - Appellant: CASCADIA WILDLANDS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE-WILDLIFE SERVICES, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and DAVID WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Oregon State Director for USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services
Animal Legal Defense Fund et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00949
Plaintiff: Animal Legal Defense Fund , Stop Animal Exploitation Now , Companion Animal Protection Society and others
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service et al
as 4:2016cv00659
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service , William Clay , David Bergman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services et al
as 3:2016cv00177
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Wildlife Services, USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services and United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands, Center For Biological Diversity, Predator Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Cascadia Wildlands et al v. USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services et al
as 6:2016cv00177
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Wildlife Services, USDA-APHIS Wildlife Services, United States Department of Agriculture and others
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands, Center For Biological Diversity, Predator Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 706 Administrative Procedures Act(Judicial Review)
Mickelsen Farms, LLC et al v. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00143
Plaintiff: Mickelsen Farms, LLC , Rigby Produce, Inc. , Wattenbarger Farms and others
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Tom Vilsack, Kevin Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Cascadia Wildlands, et al. v. Woodruff, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05132
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands , Wildearth Guardians , Kettle Range Conservation Group and others
Defendant: Roger A Woodruff, Michael Bodenchuk, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Wildlife Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2015cv00316
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands , Wildearth Guardians , Kettle Range Conservation Group and others
Defendant: Roger A Woodruff, Michael Bodenchuk, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service-Wildlife Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
WildEarth Guardians v. USDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-16071
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
WildEarth Guardians v. USDA-APHIS
as 13-16071
Amicus Curiae: NORTHEAST OREGON ECOSYSTEMS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, FRIENDS OF ANIMALS, MARK E. SMITH FOUNDATION, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, BOULDER-WHITE CLOUDS COUNCIL, CONSERVATION CONGRESS, CASCADIA WILDLANDS, IN DEFENS, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, TRAILSAVE NEVADA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?