Cases 1 - 10 of 207
NAN v. MILGRAM et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
CUNSHENG NAN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ADM GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS, SPECIAL AGENT IN CHA ORTIZ CHERYL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RODGERS v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2017cv05556
Plaintiff:
JUNE RODGERS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES CHRISTIE, CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, LAURA AND JOHN ARNOLD FOUNDATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2014cv07418
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., NEW BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2012cv04681
Petitioner:
HAKIEM BUTLER
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STACKHOUSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2012cv04574
Petitioner:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANN MILGRAM, GRAY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OSEI v. BALICKI
as 3:2011cv04273
Petitioner:
SULE S. OSEI
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MELLEADY et al v. BLAKE et al
as 1:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELLEADY and VIRGINIA KEEFER
Defendant:
ALLISON BLAKE, KATHI WAY, DEBORAH WATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBSON v. ARTHUR et al
as 1:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. GIBSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR, JASON STETSER, MAURICE S. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBSTER v. RICCI et al
as 2:2010cv05640
Petitioner:
CLAYTON WEBSTER
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and ANNE MILGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
