Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink and Diann Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023oe00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthews v. Butler County et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Estate of Cody Bohanan and Victoria Matthews
Defendant:
Butler County, Sheriff Richard K Jones, Medical Director Dr. Anthony Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Creager v. Duchak et al
as 1:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Robert Creager
Defendant:
David Duchak, Moran, Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freimuth v. Abdullah et al
as 1:2016cv00804
Plaintiff:
Arthur K Freimuth
Defendant:
Anthony Abdullah, Randall Oney, Carla Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McConnell v. Butler County Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Holly Candace McConnell
Defendant:
Butler County Ohio, Butler County Board of County Commissioners, Richard K Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Hamilton, et al v. City of Romulus, et al
as 09-2196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HAMILTON, JOHN HAMILTON, JR., JEREMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, MARC ABDILLA, MICHAEL ONDEJKO and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN
Hamilton, et al v. Granholm, et al
as 2:2001cv74698
Plaintiff:
John Hamilton , John Hamilton, Jr. , Jeremy Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Paul Martin , Hillard Hampton, III , Helen Foster and others
Objector:
Terrence Haugabook
Movant:
Martin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
