Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DOOLIN v. BROWN
as 2:2021cv00237
Defendant: ANTHONY BROWN
Plaintiff: DWAYNE DOOLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLIN v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2021cv00213
Plaintiff: DWAYNE DOOLIN
Defendant: PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL MEDICAL EMPLOYEE, PUTNAM COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., PUTNAM COUNTY HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. BOWLING
as 1:2021cv00731
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant: ERICA BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2019cv01016
Defendant: MOORE, JOHN MARTOCCIA and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORPHEW v. HIATT et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant: MATTHEW HUFFMAN, A. PETTIT, ANTHONY BROWN and others
Plaintiff: TROY MORPHEW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford et al v. Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff: National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and Continental Casualty Company
Defendant: Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc. , NoMoreClipboard, LLC , Rory Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
BROWN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv00273
Petitioner: ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent: STAN KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00339
Plaintiff: Anthony Brown
Defendant: Medical Informatics Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01279
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWN et al v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2015cv00626
Plaintiff: AMBER BROWN and ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant: CITY OF MUNCIE, INDIANA, DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RONALD MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?