Cases filed in Pennsylvania
GUICE et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Plaintiff: ROBERT GUICE , STEVEN SCOTT , THOMAS PEDICORD and others
Defendant: DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT, USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DAVIS v. FERGUSON et al
as 5:2017cv03128
Petitioner: ANTHONY DAVIS
Respondent: TAMMY S. FERGUSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CENTRE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01569
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00046
Petitioner: BRIAN ANTHONY DAVIS
Respondent: S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KREISHER v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00264
Plaintiff: KEVIN KREISHER
Defendant: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ANTHONY DAVIS, A. GREGORY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. McMillan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff: Anthony Davis, Gary Williams and Jordan Lytton
Defendant: Robert McMillan, Blume, Dodgson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABRAHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03716
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL D. ABRAHAM , TUNISIA ABRAHAM , HIRAM ALEX and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TURNER et al v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv00099
Respondent: CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff: ANTHONY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. STOWITZKY et al
as 2:2007cv02908
Petitioner: TYRONE ANTHONY DAVIS
Respondent: PAUL J. STOWITZKY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?