Cases 1 - 10 of 21
James Anthony Gonzales v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2022cv09221
Petitioner:
James Anthony Gonzales
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Anthony Gonzales v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2022cv05828
Petitioner:
James Anthony Gonzales
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00112
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Gonzales v. Tham et al
as 1:2020cv00800
Defendant:
Shaffer, Maya, Kings County Deputies and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales (ID 54616) v. Hood et al
as 5:2019cv03099
Defendant:
Louis A. Podrebarac, (fnu) (lnu) (3), A. S. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Anthony Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Karl Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Troupe v. Pease et al
as 4:2015cv05021
Plaintiff:
David Troupe
Defendant:
Charles W Pease, Ronald Knight, Christopher Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. State of Utah
as 14-4131
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR ANTHONY GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH
USA v. Antonio Castro-Guzman
as 14-56645
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTONIO CASTRO-GUZMAN, AKA Anthony Castro, AKA Anthony Gonzales Castro, AKA Antonio Castro, AKA Antonio Guzman Castro, AKA Guzman Anthony Castro, AKA Anthony Castro-Guzman
Gonzales v. Tate et al
as 1:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Gonzales
Defendant:
H. Tate, S. Shiesha, D. Longcrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
