Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Carrillo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Carrillo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maddox El v. Wickersham
as 2:2023cv12427
Petitioner:
Kevin Maddox El
Respondent:
Anthony M. Wickersham
Collier v. Wiekersham
as 2:2023cv12325
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Collier
Respondent:
Anthony M. Wiekershaw and Anthony M. Wiekersham
Hewitt et al v. Mountjoy et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Carrie Hewitt and Carlos Hewitt
Defendant:
Anthony Mountjoy, Miami Township and Anthony M Mountjoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
Robinson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Robinson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buza v. Wickersham et al
as 2:2022cv10320
Plaintiff:
Andrew Louis Buza
Defendant:
Anthony M. Wickersham, John "Jail Office" Doe and Macomb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoepf v. City of Amherst et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Hoepf
Defendant:
City of Amherst, Thomas A. Januzzi, Sanders Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Laidler v. Macomb County
as 2:2021cv11755
Plaintiff:
Keri Lynn Laidler
Defendant:
Macomb County, Correction Officer Jonathan Sego, Correctional Officer Michael Soulliere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
