Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jaramillo v. Texas, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Officer Okeshia L. Waters, Assistant Warden Darron Lane, Sergeant Charles A. Halem and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Ziegenfuss, Jr. v. Anthony Mackey, et al
as 21-15759
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTHONY MACKEY, Pro-tem Judge and LAWRENCE F. WINTHROP, Judge
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ZIEGENFUSS, Jr.
James Ziegenfuss, Jr. v. Anthony Mackey, et al
as 20-17279
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTHONY MACKEY, Pro-tem Judge and LAWRENCE F. WINTHROP, Judge
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ZIEGENFUSS, Jr.
Anthony White v. Darron Lane, et al
as 20-40177
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH R. RODEN, BRENNAN F. SHAY, COLBY L. SCOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY WAYNE WHITE
White v. Lane et al
as 6:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Brandon L Brewer, Anthony Mackey, Jr, Sergio Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Muro et al
as 4:2018cv01402
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dewayne Evans
Defendant:
Javier Muro, Anthony Mackey, Jr., Rolando Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Muro et al
as 2:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dewayne Evans
Defendant:
Javier Muro, Anthony Mackey, Jr., Rolando Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Mackey
as 2:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Robrichee D Jackson
Defendant:
Anthony Mackey, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong v. Livingston et al
as 2:2016cv00131
Plaintiff:
Tabari S Strong
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, William Stephen, Gary Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
