Cases 11 - 20 of 104
FLORA et al v. RICH et al
as 2:2020cv01372
Defendant:
ANTHONY P RICH and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE FLORA and GLENN A FLORA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catanzaro v. Harned et al
as 3:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Barbara Harned and Maurice Lamoreux
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Catanzaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VOLPE v. TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY et al
as 2:2019cv05778
Defendant:
NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD SCHWARZ, TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VOLPE and M.D. ANTHONY P. VOLPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosenfeld v. Esterline Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01891
Defendant:
Nils E. Larsen, Esterline Technologies Corporation, Scott E. Kuechle and others
Plaintiff:
Chaim Rosenfeld
CLAYTON v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv16476
Defendant:
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, DENISE M. MORRISON and ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. CLAYTON
Kent v. Esterline Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01862
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Nils E. Larsen, Esterline Technologies Corporation, Delores M. Etter and others
BANKALTER v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv15694
Defendant:
ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and DENISE M. MORRISON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BANKALTER
MARDER v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv14385
Plaintiff:
MARISA MARDER
Defendant:
ANTHONY P. DISILVESTRO, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY and DENISE M. MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VANGJELI v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL I et al
as 2:2018cv02882
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL I and ANTHONY P. SODROSKI
Plaintiff:
SUZANA VANGJELI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KUBU v. EISENBERG et al
as 2:2018cv09124
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMAS KUBU
Defendant:
STEVEN K EISENBERG , JACUELINE F MCNALLY , DAVID M LAMBROPOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
