Cases 1 - 10 of 16
ROBINSON v. DALISMA et al.
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant:
DR. DALISMA, ROXY PLAYSO, NURSE ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
TIMKO et al v. NSPA LOUNGE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01307
Defendant:
YADWINDER SINGH, BALJINDER KAUR, HIMANSHU BHATIA and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI TIMKO, ANTHONY ROBINSON and STEPHANIE DARNELL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROBINSON v. HARPER
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
HARPER
Plaintiff:
ROBINSON
Petitioner:
TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON and TODD ANTHONY GLOVER
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00905
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 2:2019cv03464
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROBINSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07306
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY ROBINSON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Southers et al
as 3:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Southers, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson, Joshua Payne, Maurice Edwards and others
Defendant:
John Wetzel and Jeffy Ditty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
