Cases 41 - 50 of 95
HALEY v. FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 1:2020cv00203
Respondent:
Fulton County Georgia, Johnson State Prison and Warden Antoine Caldwell
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GLENN v. WICKER et al
as 5:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MESSER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MORRIS, OFFICER HAMEEM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GLENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whittington v. Caldwell
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Warden Antoine Caldwell
Plaintiff:
James Whittington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey et al v. The Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv04630
Plaintiff:
Melissa Riley Carey and Wallace Riley
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Antoine Caldwell, The Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fincher et al v. Georgia Dept et al
as 1:2019cv04560
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lyall, Cameron Ellis, Scott Simmons and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Warden Antoine Caldwell, Unit Manager Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. County of Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv04552
Defendant:
Kenneth Cowen, County of Athens-Clarke, Antoine Caldwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Parrish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOK v. CALDWELL et al
as 3:2019cv00056
Plaintiff:
Marcus Louis Cook
Defendant:
OFFICER BURTON, Officer Williams, PSYCHIATRIST HUNSUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. CALDWELL
as 1:2019cv00100
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
VERNARD B PATTERSON and VERNARD BERNARD PATTERSON
Respondent:
Warden Antoine Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PATTERSON v. CALDWELL
as 5:2019cv00244
Petitioner:
VERNARD B PATTERSON
Respondent:
ANTOINE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COOK v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LOUIS COOK
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR JOHN DOE, MAIL ROOM STAFF JOHN DOE, OFFICER BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
