Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Garcia v. Carniceria Rancho Alegre LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Jesus Antonio Castillo Garcia
Defendant:
Carniceria Rancho Alegre LLC, Adalberto Gamez Cornejo and Melissa Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ:
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Antonio A Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
TDCJ-ID, Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. CIR
as 24-60251
Petitioner:
Antonio A. Garcia
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Garcia v. Disciplinary Department
as 6:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Unknown Defendant
as 24-40328
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Mail Department, Grievance Department and others
Garcia v. Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID et al
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID, Directors Review Committee and M.S.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Dist. Ct. of Southern Dist. of Corpus Christi Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
