Cases 1 - 10 of 13
USA v. Eduardo Herrera-Nam
as 19-50130
Defendant / Appellant:
EDUARDO ANTONIO HERRERA-NAM, also known as Eduardo A. Herrera
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Siola Quinteros-Hernandez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60563
Petitioner:
SIOLA DINORA QUINTEROS-HERNANDEZ and ALEXIS ANTONIO HERRERA-QUINTEROS
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Eduardo Herrera-Nam
as 17-50510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO ANTONIO HERRERA-NAM, also known as Eduardo A. Herrera
Herrera-Nam v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00066
Petitioner:
Eduardo Antonio Herrera-Nam
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
USA v. Eduardo Herrera-Nam
as 15-50349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO ANTONIO HERRERA-NAM, also known as Eduardo A. Herrera
Herrera v. Pearson et al
as 5:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mariano Antonio Herrera
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Archie B. Longley, S. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00927
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Acuna et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Vincent Acuna, Jr., Jorge Aguilar O.J.R., Brian Albrecht and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Herrera-Bautista v. USA
as 2:2011cv02636
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Herrera-Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
