Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff: Richie Antonio Hill, David Baxter, Richie A. Hill and others
Defendant: No Named Defendant, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M. Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baxter-Bosdale v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv00599
Plaintiff: Richard Antonio-Hill Baxter-Bosdale
Defendant: No Named Defendants, BOP Government, The and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kajunju v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff: Akili Mali Kajunju
Defendant: CO Hughes, CO Ragland, CO Deuilfa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv14348
Respondent: Florida Attorney General and Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Antonio Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01104
Petitioner: Antonio Hill
Respondent: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv10870
Plaintiff: Antonio Hill
Defendant: Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hare v. Shim et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv03296
Plaintiff: Delfon Lebrew Hare, Sr.
Defendant: Jae B. Shim, Antonio Hill, Harold Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv05027
Plaintiff: Antonio Hill
Defendant: Thomas Dart and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. USA - 2255 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv00104
Petitioner: Antonio Hill, Jr.
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2013cv02648
Plaintiff: Antonio Hill
Defendant: City Of Memphis, Tennessee and Lee V. Coffee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?