Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Mendez-Navarrete v. Garland
as 22-1404
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MENDEZ-NAVARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Arturo Mendez-Gomez
as 22-254
Petitioner:
In re: ARTURO MENDEZ-GOMEZ, a/k/a Antonio Mendez-Gomez
United States of America v. Mendez Feliz
as 22-1116
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marcos Antonio Mendez Feliz, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
USA v. Mendez
as 22-10293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Antonio Mendez, also known as Ace
USA v. Antonio Mendez-Ramos
as 20-12821
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO MENDEZ-RAMOS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Arturo Mendez-Gomez
as 19-7453
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTURO MENDEZ-GOMEZ, a/k/a Antonio Mendez-Gomez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rosalio Mendez-Lopez, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60667
Petitioner:
MELVIN ANTONIO MENDEZ-JULIAN and ROSALIO ANTONIO MENDEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendez Flores v. Barr
as 19-1526
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR ANTONIO MENDEZ FLORES
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Asencion Gines Dominguez, et al v. Leonidas Osorio, et al
as 19-55083
Defendant:
PAYPAL.COM, a Delaware Corportion, DBA Xoom.com, ARTURO ORTIZ, an individual, La Unica Internacional Sonora Santanera S. de R.L., DBA LA Internacional Sonora Santanera S.A. de C.V., ISPOT. TV, a Washington State Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONIDAS OSORIO, an individual La Nueva Sangre Sonora Santanera and RAUL MENDOZA, an individual Non-Register LA Sonora Santanera De Carlos Colorado
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASENCION GINES DOMINGUEZ, an individual La Sonora Santanera De Carlos Colorado and NORMA ALMAZAN COLORADO, an individual
Cruz Mendez v. William Barr
as 19-70082
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CRUZ MENDEZ, AKA Cruz Antonio Mendez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
