Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Sandoval v. USA
as 6:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Pablo Antonio Sandoval
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Sandoval
as 23-40452
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Pablo Antonio Sandoval
Antonio Sandoval-Damian v. William Barr
as 20-72241
Petitioner:
ANTONIO DE JESUS SANDOVAL-DAMIAN, AKA Antonio Sandoval
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Sandoval Pinon v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019cv12374
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Antonio Sandoval Pinon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Sandoval Pinon v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv02044
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Antonio Sandoval Pinon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Sandoval Pinon v. Ford Motor Company
as CO/1:19-CV-02044
Plaintiff:
Sandoval Pinon and Ramiro Antonio Sandoval Pinon
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Sandoval et al v. Sonaal Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02576
Defendant:
Michael Besse, Metropolitan Avenue Associates, Inc., Manjula Mukhopadhyay and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Antonio Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sandoval v. WG & Associates Mgmt & Dev. LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02477
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sandoval
Defendant:
WG & Associates Mgmt & Dev. LLC, WG Associates 111 Street, LLC and William Guererro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rice v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv06887
Defendant:
Justinian Mateo, Chris Bane, Earnest Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery E. Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
