Cases 1 - 10 of 375
USA v. Hector Apodaca-Alvarez
as 24-11125
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HECTOR ALEJANDRO APODACA-ALVAREZ
Apodaca v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
James Lewis Apodaca
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Vroom, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Apodaca
Defendant:
Vroom Inc., Vroom Automotive, LLC and United Auto Credit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White VS Garland et.al.
as 3:2024cv00076
Defendant:
Veronica Escobar, Merrick Garland, Veronica Escobar (Pleters) and others
Plaintiff:
Leeland O. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Apodaca v. Herron et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Amanda Apodaca
Defendant:
Jonathan Herron and Gainsco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe v. Santa Fe Public Schools et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Santa Fe Public Schools, Robert Apodaca, Candice Flint and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
APODACA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29216
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL APODACA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
