Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Bolotin v. Apotex Corp.
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Bolotin
Defendant:
Apotex Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
APOTEX INC. et al v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2022cv02342
Plaintiff:
APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd. et al v. Apotex Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv05190
Plaintiff:
Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd. and Dexcel Ltd.
Defendant:
Apotex Corp. and Apotex Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01037
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY v. APOTEX, INC.
as 1:2017cv02865
Defendant:
APOTEX, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
APOTEX INC.v. ALCON RESEARCH, LTD, et al.
as 1:2016cv03145
Defendant:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and ALCON RESEARCH, LTD
Plaintiff:
APOTEX INC.
Intervenor Defendant:
BARR LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01512
Plaintiff:
ACRUX DDS PTY LTD., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and ELI LILLY EXPORT S.A.
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
APOTEX CORP. v. UMANA et al
as 1:2015cv01638
Plaintiff:
APOTEX CORP.
Defendant:
REVELATION EXPRESS TRUCKING CORP. and EDWIN J. UMANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
