Cases 121 - 130 of 140
Franklin v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00704
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Franklin
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Carr v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01996
Plaintiff:
Deborah Carr
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sullivan v. Apple, inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01993
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sullivan
Defendant:
Apple, inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pietrangelo v. Apple, inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael Pietrangelo
Defendant:
Apple, inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv04451
Plaintiff:
Avi Koschitzki
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Payne et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Payne, William French, Karen Michaels and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Payne et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03353
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Payne, William French, Karen Michaels and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Koschitzki v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03321
Plaintiff:
Avi Koschitzki, Avi Koschitzki and Avi Koschitzki
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Apple Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Gonzalez et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03278
Plaintiff:
Onel Gonzalez, Onel Gonzalez, Ron J. Brayteson and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RITCHIE v. APPLE INC. et al
as 5:2009cv03277
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RITCHIE and TIMOTHY RITCHIE
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Apple Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
ADAM GONNELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
