Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Coleman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
William C. Coleman
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Tahir Siddiq, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Teresa Gates, Angela Irvin, Rhett King and others
Defendant:
Katrina Lashae Bass and Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Dana Berry, Emily Culver, Lisa Shehee and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Nichols et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Patrick Nichols, David Blietz, Nell Motley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Bates v. Lancaster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00918
Defendant:
LPN Appling, Shah Saeed, Laurance McMillian and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans
Peacock v. Wexford Health Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv01019
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care, Ms. Duffell, Ms. Appling and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
Jared Eastman
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Abbott v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Dr. Saddiq, Jeff Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Apple Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01133
Plaintiff:
Greg L. Davis
Defendant:
Apple Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
