Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Fields v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, Gulfport Police Dept, State of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Coopper et al
as 4:2019cv04060
Defendant:
Harris Health System, Aramark, Harris County Jail Mail Room and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taggart v. Gonzales
as 4:2019cv02814
Plaintiff:
Dion Lee Taggart
Defendant:
Ed Gonzales and Aramark Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Aramark et al
as 4:2019cv02470
Respondent:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail and Aramark
Petitioner:
Owen Ketih Crawford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Commissary Aramark et al
as 4:2019cv00456
Defendant:
Commissary Aramark, Dr. FNU Mixon and Officer FNU Cardenas
Plaintiff:
Alex Perry Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2019cv00888
Defendant:
SGT. Villaboboz, Sheriff Ed Gonzales and Aramark Harris County
Plaintiff:
Lastersteen Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ready v. Jackson Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dion Ready
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Jackson Public Defenders Office, Jackson County Circuit Courts and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Denton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Defendant:
Denton County Sheriff's Office, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, FNU Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes v. Aramark Corporation
as 4:2018cv01414
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Dykes
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
