Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Bryant v. Gusman et al
as 2:2016cv17988
Plaintiff:
Cortrell Rashaad Bryant
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman and Aramark Correctional Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric J. Foss and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Bexar County Jail et al
as 5:2016cv01088
Defendant:
Aramark Commissary Provider, Bexar County Jail and University Health Detention Services
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Gusman et al
as 2:2016cv15046
Plaintiff:
Doc Eugene Warren, III
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Nurse Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Administrative Segregation et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dayrin L Robinson
Defendant:
Administative Segregation, The Inmate Grievance Office, Aramark Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGary v. Ramon et al
as 6:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Billy McGary, Jr
Defendant:
Maria Ramon and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlon Smith v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 15-50413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RAUL BANASCO, Jail Administrator and ARAMARK
Smith v. Bexar County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2015cv00008
Defendant:
Aramark, Raul Banasco and Bexar County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Marlon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombardi v. Aramark
as 3:2014cv00679
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Lombardi
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Thompson v. Adrian Garcia, et al
as 14-20505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN GARCIA, UNNAMED OTHER EMPLOYEES OF HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and ARAMARK MAINTENANCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
