Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stallworth #702124 v. Williams-Overstreet et al
as 1:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Victor Derek Stallworth #702124
Defendant:
L. Williams-Overstreet, Aramark Corporation, J. Wilbur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv13767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Annabel #414234 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Aramark Corporation, Inc., Daniel Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Beasely et al v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2015cv00374
Defendant:
Kent, County of , Lawrence A. Stelma , Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rodell Beasely, Jr. , Brandon Davis , Dwayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ostrander #631912 v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01219
Plaintiff:
Randy Ostrander #631912
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and F. Hand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodman v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv14420
Plaintiff:
Chester Bodman
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Davre Davidson, Bob Marshall and others
Velthuysen #195606 v. Aramark Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00192
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Velthuysen #195606
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Macomb County Jail et al
as 5:2010cv11243
Plaintiff:
LaVelle W Searcy
Defendant:
Macomb County Jail, Aramark Corporation and Michelle Sanborn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
