Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jones v. McCormack
as 24-54
Petitioner / Appellant: RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Respondent / Appellee: NED MCCORMACK
ARDEN ROW ASSETS, LLC et al v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2023cv02696
Plaintiff: ARDEN ROW ASSETS, LLC, BASSWOOD AGGREGATES, LLC and DELWOOD RESOURCES, LLC
Defendant: U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Arden v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as MA/1:23-CV-12015
Plaintiff: Arden and Christopher C. Arden
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation, Pension Benefit Information, LLC d/b/a PBI Research Services doing business as PBI Research Services and The Prudential Insurance Company of America
EVANS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01405
Plaintiff: BETSY B. EVANS, DONALD R. EVANS, JR., ARDEN W. THORNTON and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Agro Holdings LLC et al v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff: Agro Holdings LLC, Alameda Aggregates LLC, Aquatic Creek LLC and others
Defendant: Arden Row Assets LLC, United States of America, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jones et al v. USA
as 2:2022mc00683
Plaintiff: Debra Jones and Arden C. Post
Petitioner: Keith Campbell and Vance Norton
Defendant: USA
Kassab et al v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2022cv12307
Plaintiff: Arden Kassab, Pharmaco, Inc. and Alternative Gardens, LLC
Defendant: City of Detroit and Detroit, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. William DeCory
as 22-2889
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America
Defendant / Appellee: William Martin Ardene DeCory
In re: William DeCory
as 22-1297
Petitioner: In re: William Martin Ardene DeCory

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?