Cases filed in Arizona
Robart v. Apache County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2021cv08180
Plaintiff: David Arden Robart
Defendant: Apache County Sheriff's Department, Joseph Dedman, Jr., John Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv08148
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Canita v. Rios et al
as 2:2019cv05400
Defendant: Jean Russ, Unknown Saxon, Michelle Vasey and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Lonnie Canita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. O'Sick et al
as 2:2016cv00164
Plaintiff: Joshua Allen Pitts
Defendant: Unknown O'Sick, Unknown Nilson, Unknown Arden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arden et al v. East Coast Assemblers Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02290
Plaintiff: Andrew Arden , Michael Doyle , Colt Hodges and others
Defendant: East Coast Assemblers Incorporated, Glenn Schneider, Jenny Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arden v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01944
Plaintiff: Clayton Arden
Defendant: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam, LLC, Botanical Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. v. Elizabeth Arden, et al Featured Case
as 2:2008cv02299
Plaintiff: Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. and Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C.
Defendant: Elizabeth Arden, Melbourne IT DBS, Inc., Internet Names Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Elizabeth Arden Salons, Inc. v. Saks & Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00646
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Arden Salons, Inc. and Elizabeth Arden Salons, Inc.
Defendant: Saks & Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?