Cases filed in Arizona
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00872
Petitioner: Johnny Lee NIchols
Respondent: Arkansas, State of, Dexter Payne and G Lay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott, II v. Maricopa, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00607
Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant: Maricopa, County of, Tennessee, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant: James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver: Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner: First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Patterson v. Shartle
as 4:2015cv00086
Petitioner: Charles Patterson
Respondent: Unknown Shartle
Movant: Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?