Cases 21 - 30 of 2,037
Geddings v. Criner et al
as 4:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Robert Geddings
Defendant:
Blake Criner, Arkansas Department of Correction and Todd Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1051
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Watkins v. Delaney et al
as 6:2023cv06104
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Sgt. Delaney and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3577
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv05196
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Shreck v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Shreck
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv06112
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
