Cases 51 - 60 of 119
Billy Nichols, Jr. v. Gary Kerstein, et al
as 22-2710
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Mack Nichols, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Gary Kerstein, Doctor, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, Tracy Bennett, APRN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit, Duvall, LPN, East Arkansas Regional Max Security Unit and others
Stanley Nelson v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Isaac Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelley)
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2551
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders Carter v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sanders McDaniel Carter
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Weaver v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Desmond Weaver
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Board of Directors, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saba Makkali v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saba K. Makkali, originally named as Gary T. Cloird
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
John Hill v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John L. Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Tevarius Green v. Dexter Payne
as 22-1421
Petitioner:
Tevarius Tevon Green
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
