Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Martinez v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03259
Plaintiff:
Winston Armando Martinez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Quijano et al v. Hansen et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Jose Fernando Quijano, Duval Quintero, Henrri Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Colt Jamison Hansen, Hansen Brand LLC and Westcoast Growers LLC
Martinez v. PTG Logistics LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02319
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez
Defendant:
PTG Logistics LLC and Leslie Steve Lyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Martinez et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez, Maria Consuelo Banda and Armando Alvarez Martinez
Defendant:
Lakhwinder Singh, Herman Russeau, United Transport 3 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Caldwell et al v. HM Traction LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Selisha Caldwell
Defendant:
HM Traction LLC and Andis Armando Martinez - Taquechel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
David Armando Martinez v. Robinhood Crypto, LLC, et al
as 23-55319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ARMANDO MARTINEZ, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINHOOD CRYPTO, LLC, a California Foreign Limited Liability Company, ROBINHOOD SECURITIES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02642
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO MARTINEZ, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez-Martinez v. Garland
as 22-1055
Petitioner:
JOSE ARMANDO MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
