Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodriguez v. Riverstone Communities, LLC.
as 6:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Riverstone Communities, LLC.
Garcia et al v. Brothers Fire Protection Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60312
Defendant:
Rick A Sheffield, Brian A. Kenney and Brothers Fire Protection Inc.
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez Martinez and Jesus Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Phillip Haskett v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 19-1116
Plaintiff:
VICTOR TEIXEIRA, MAILE CAPERS-CRISTOBAL, ALECE ALEXANDER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JOHN DOES I-V and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP DAVID HASKETT
Rodriguez-Tovar v. Farm City Meat, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03476
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez-Tovar
Defendant:
Farm City Meat, Inc. and Soleman Fawzi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. John Eagle Sport City Motors, LLP
as 3:2014cv00334
Plaintiff:
Oscar Armando Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Eagle Sport City Motors LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 3:2013cv02757
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marshall , Sharon Jones , Juanita Valadez and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Villanueva-Gonzalez et al v. Gallegos-Naranjo et al
as 2:2009cv00716
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Villanueva-Gonzalez, Marcelino Acosta-Guerrero, Efrain Almaraz-Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Grainger Farms, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 6:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Armando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fonseca-Islas et al v. Barnes Farm LLLP et al
as 3:2008cv00674
Plaintiff:
Francisco Fonseca-Islas, Cecilia Arcos, Juan Mariano and others
Defendant:
Barnes Farm LLLP, Marcus E. Barnes and Dale L. Barnes
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
