Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Armstrong v. USA
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Dontay Lafon Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. USA
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Khalil Rashad Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Williams
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority, Larry Leabough, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Armstrong
as 7:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Deputy B. A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2023cv05841
Plaintiff:
Eugene C. Dingle
Defendant:
Leslie Armstrong and Tim Mose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Laurens County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2023cv04911
Plaintiff:
Catherine Evans
Defendant:
Laurens County Sheriff's Office, Dillon Miller, Jared Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Pinckney v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv05344
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Pinckney
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Julie Armstrong, Judge Kristi Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dingle v. Sterling et al
as 2:2023cv05333
Plaintiff:
Eugene C Dingle
Defendant:
Candace Loreal Sterling, Tim Mose, Daniel Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
