Cases 1 - 10 of 17
James River Insurance Company v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
James River Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Haldeman Armstrong, Jr, W.M. and F.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Rusk v. McGrath et al
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Zachary Rusk
Defendant:
Mike McGraph, Laurie McKinnon, James Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Bludworth, et al
as 6:2021cv00026
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Pete Bludworth
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2018cv00075
Defendant:
Cattail Creek Community Association(s) of Phase I, II and III & of the Combined Covenant Association, Daniel S. Madison, Amanda Menasco and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Lewis and Clark County
as 6:2020cv00088
Petitioner:
Charles Allen Armstrong
Respondent:
Lewis and Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce Flooring, Inc. v. Armstrong Flooring, Inc.
as 9:2020cv00049
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Armstrong Flooring, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pierce Flooring, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Valley Flooring, LCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clouse v. Alternatives Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brett Wade Clouse
Defendant:
Betty Ann Roan, Loretta Willems, Alternatives Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Karen Armstrong
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Robinson Insulation Company, John Swing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong et al v. Kadas
as 6:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kathy Armstrong , Jerry Armstrong and Association of Christian Schools International
Defendant:
Mike Kadas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2015cv00087
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Farrell Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
