Cases filed in Pennsylvania
JOHNSON et al v. VILLICO et al
as 2:2022cv03888
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JOHNSON and ALICIA SHEPARD
Defendant: GIUSEPPE VILLICO and GIOVANNA VILLICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. GILMORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv04661
Petitioner: ARTHUR JOHNSON
Respondent: ROBERT GILMORE, DIST ATTYS OFFICE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00863
Plaintiff: Arthur Johnson
Defendant: John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00726
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown et al v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00446
Plaintiff: Richard Brown and Arthur Johnson
Defendant: Kevin Smith and C.R. Treece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02412
Plaintiff: FRANK DUKES
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ARTHUR JOHNSON and LUCRETI DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv02389
Plaintiff: SHAMAR HUGHES and DEIDRE HUGHES
Defendant: SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA , SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION and ARTHUR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90088
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JOHNSON, ARTHUR JOHNSON and CASEY JOHNSON
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JOHNSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84671
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JOHNSON
Defendant: A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?