Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Robinson v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Chris Evans, Angie Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Robinson v. State of Louisiana
as 14-30282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR R. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN BENJAMIN
Arthur Robinson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-11305
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Arthur Robinson v. State of Louisiana
as 14-30135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR R. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN BENJAMIN
IMO 2013 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2013mc00060
Respondent:
Anne M Schueler-Hickey, Tanya Renee Bell, Christina Johnston Cloutier and others
In Re:
Failure to Comply With Continuing Legal Education Requrements, Nonpayment of Attorney Registration Fees, and/or Failure to Submit IOLTA Certification re Indiana Supreme Court Order of May 30, 2013
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Robinson et al v. Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP
as 3:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Arthur S. Robinson and Allan Beiswenger
Defendant:
Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2012cv01170
Petitioner:
Arthur L. Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON v. TUCKER
as 1:2012cv00147
Petitioner:
ARTHUR L ROBINSON
Respondent:
KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
