Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Acosta et al. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv12039
Plaintiff:
Robert Beliveau, Patrick Burns, Ralph Baez and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
US v. Parrilla
as 15-2403
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNDON J. PARRILLA
Interested Party:
WARREN ANGUS, STEPHEN BABIN, ARTHUR BALDWIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2707
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Arthur Baldwin, et al, et al
as 11-4447
Not Party - Respondent:
In re: LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
Defendant - Petitioner:
JEROME BULLOCK, ANGELA FORD, JOANNE MARIE ANDIORIO and others
Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
In re: Lemington Home for the Aged, et al v. Jerome Bullock, et al
as 11-8098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
In re: LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
Plaintiff - Respondent:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF LEMINGTON HOME FOR THE AGED
Defendant - Petitioner:
ARTHUR BALDWIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4456
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS,etc. v. BALDWIN, et.al.
as 2:2010cv00800
Plaintiff:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS
Defendant:
ARTHUR BALDWIN , LINDA COBB , JEROME BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
v. BALDWIN et al
as 2:2008cv89384
Defendant:
ARTHUR BALDWIN, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
