Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Arthur BellIn re: Arthur Bell
as 24-1180
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR BELL
Respondent: KIM CARGOR, Warden
Arthur BellIn re: Arthur Bell
as 23-1950
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR BELL
Respondent: KIM CARGOR, Warden
Bell v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04883
Plaintiff: Arthur Bell
Defendant: National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
In re: Arthur Bell
as 20-1879
Respondent: NOAH NAGY, Warden
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR BELL
Arthur Bell
as 20-1487
Petitioner: In re: ARTHUR BELL
Respondent: SHERRY L. BURT, Warden
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff: Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant: E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arthur Bell v. James Biven, et al
as 19-1649
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES BIVEN, Detective, CITY OF DETROIT, MI and MARVIN BUTLER, Detective
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARTHUR BELL
Bell v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01842
Petitioner: Darryl Arthur Bell
Respondent: Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, District Attorney of Philadelphia and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv22043
Plaintiff: Arthur Bell
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Arthur Bell v. Carol Howes, et al
as 14-1169
Petitioner - Appellant: ARTHUR BELL
Respondent - Appellee: CAROL R. HOWES, Warden, Warden, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Governor, State of Michigan, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?