Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Arthur West, I v. Port of Tacoma, et al
as 12-35712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant - Appellee:
PORT OF TACOMA, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PORT OF OLYMPIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35603
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael McCall, et al v. Intercity Transit, et al
as 11-35602
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCALL
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant - Appellee:
INTERCITY TRANSIT, EVE JOHNSON, MARTIN THIES and others
Arthur West, I v. Marti Maxwell, et al
as 10-35909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I, State Ex Rel
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTI MAXWELL, BRUCE E. HELLER, THURSTON COUNTY and others
Arthur West, I v. Marti Maxwell, et al
as 10-35608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I, State Ex Rel
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTI MAXWELL, BRUCE E. HELLER, THURSTON COUNTY and others
Arthur West v. Stephen Johnson, et al
as 09-36066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN L. JOHNSON, U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATOR, US SECRETARY OF COMMERCE and others
WILLIAMSON et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 1:2003cv01456
Plaintiff:
AFEWERKI ABEBE, ODEY AGI, MALCOLM BELFROM, JR. and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS-DISTRICT LODGE 141-M and UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Claimant:
MICHAEL M OLSON
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
SCOTT et al v. A.C. AND S., INC, (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv84486
Plaintiff:
FANNIE SCOTT and JOHN ARTHUR SCOTT
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC, (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
