Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shawnetta Small v. Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Ctr, et al
as 23-3730
Plaintiff:
Shawnetta Small and Hairtabulous, LLC
Defendant:
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, Courtenay Lee Miller, Tyronn Wise and others
Harp v. Aspire Health Partners, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
William Harp
Defendant:
ASPIRE HEALTH PARTNERS, INC.
Small et al v. Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Shawnetta Small and Hairtabulous, LLC
Defendant:
Poplar Bluff Regional Medical Center, Courtenay Lee Miller, Tyronn Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
S.K. et al v. School Board of Orange County, Florida et al
as 6:2020cv02167
Defendant:
School Board of Orange County, Florida, Aspire Health Partners, Inc. f/k/a Lakeside Behavioral Healthcare, Inc., Robert Cline and others
Plaintiff:
Brian King, Roxanne King, S.K. a Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lane v. Estate of Rayfield and Jean E. Lane et al
as 6:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Mitchell Lane, Melody Lane, Fla. Dept. of Corrections Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Aspired Health Partners et al
as 6:2019cv01899
Plaintiff:
Keldon Uriah Walker
Defendant:
Valerie Westhead and Aspired Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disability Rights Florida, Inc. v. Jacobs et al
as 6:2018cv01863
Defendant:
Richard Jacobs and Aspire Health Partners, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Florida, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
