Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United State of America et al v. SAF, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
United States of America and William E. Groves Construction, LLC
Defendant:
SAF, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
United States of America v. SAF, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
SAF, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Star Insurance Company v. Singh et al
as 1:2022cv07968
Plaintiff:
Star Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Inderpal Singh, Sikander Singh and Tejinder Singh
Defendant:
Sarbjit Singh, Harvinder Pal Singh, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United Specialty Insurance Company v. At-Saf, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03786
Plaintiff:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
At-Saf, Inc., Inderpal Singh, Sikander Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Faruolo v. Transport SAF, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Defendant:
Transport SAF, Inc. and Martin Genereux
Plaintiff:
Alison Faruolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chuzhou Jincheng Metal Work Co., Ltd. v. AT-SAF INC.
as 1:2020cv00745
Defendant:
AT-SAF INC.
Plaintiff:
Chuzhou Jincheng Metal Work Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Sulzer Pumps Solutions (US), Inc. v. SAF, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01337
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Sulzer Pumps Solutions (US), Inc.
Defendant:
SAF, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Teixeira et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2012cv03288
Plaintiff:
John Teixeira , Steve Nobriga , Gary Gamaza and others
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Alameda Board of Supervisors, Wilma Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
