Cases 41 - 50 of 335
Atchley v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
J.D. Atchley
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners Inc, Tanya Mathus, Shivani Malhotra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Atchley
as 3:2022cv00363
Petitioner:
Ronnie Jones
Respondent:
M Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Atchley
as 3:2022cv01681
Petitioner:
Ronnie Jones
Respondent:
M Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Case Records at Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Case Records at Salinas Valley State Prison, Matthew Atchley and Litigation Department at Salinas Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Buren v. Gee et al
as 5:2022cv01563
Plaintiff:
Irvin Van Buren
Defendant:
S. Gee, T. Lemon, Warden Matthew Atchley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Toles v. Foss et al
as 4:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Corey Antionne Toles
Defendant:
Tammy Foss, M. Atchley, P. Rakitin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Pacheco Lara v. Matthew Atchley
as 22-15214
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN PACHECO LARA
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden
(HC) Iturralde v. Atchley
as 2:2022cv00272
Petitioner:
Edward Iturralde
Respondent:
Matthew Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shikeb Saddozai v. M. Atchley, et al
as 22-15183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
M. B. ATCHLEY, Head Warden, SVSP, L. M. PENNISI, Facility Captain, SVSP and DIRECTOR, Director for CDCR
Michael Harris v. M. Atchley, et al
as 22-15163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. ATCHLEY, Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, KATHLEEN ALLISON, T. VANG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
